FIFA faces backlash over commercial breaks during World Cup matches

1 hour ago 2



Soccer has always been the sport that advertisers couldn’t crack. Two 45-minute halves of uninterrupted action, no timeouts, no TV breaks. That was the deal. For the 2026 World Cup in the United States, Canada, and Mexico, FIFA decided to change the deal.

The tournament now features mandatory three-minute “hydration breaks” at approximately the 22nd and 67th minutes of each match. The stated reason is player welfare. The actual result is that Fox, the English-language broadcaster, is projected to generate up to $250 million in additional ad revenue from these stoppages.

The break heard around the world

Here’s the thing about these hydration breaks: they happen every single match, regardless of the actual weather conditions. Climate-controlled stadiums with retractable roofs and air conditioning? Breaks still happen. Evening kickoffs in temperate Canadian cities? Breaks still happen.

Fox has reportedly estimated it can charge around $300,000 per 30-second commercial spot during these windows. With more than 800 ads expected across the tournament’s hydration breaks, the math adds up to a quarter-billion-dollar windfall. For context, that’s a revenue stream that didn’t exist in any previous World Cup in the tournament’s 96-year history.

And Fox hasn’t exactly been subtle about maximizing the opportunity. Reports indicate the broadcaster has aired ads that encroach on the play resumption time, meaning viewers are watching commercials while the actual match has already restarted. Despite this being a violation of the broadcast rules FIFA itself established, no repercussions have followed.

Players and fans push back

Netherlands captain Virgil van Dijk, one of the most respected defenders in world soccer, has expressed clear disdain for the hydration breaks. His view is shared by Carli Lloyd, the former US Women’s National Team star and two-time World Cup champion, who has also criticized the stoppages as serving commercial interests rather than genuine player welfare.

Not every broadcaster has taken the same approach, though. Telemundo, the Spanish-language broadcaster for the tournament, has opted to show live action and analysis during the hydration breaks rather than cutting to advertisements. The contrast is hard to miss. Two networks covering the same event, one treating the breaks as sacred commercial inventory, the other treating them as part of the match coverage.

How we got here

FIFA formalized the hydration break initiative between December 2025 and March 2026, with the tournament kicking off in mid-June 2026. The timing is notable because it means the decision was made well in advance of any actual weather data for the host venues.

Hydration breaks aren’t entirely new to soccer. They’ve been used in domestic leagues and international tournaments held in extreme heat, like the 2014 World Cup in Brazil and various Middle Eastern competitions. But those were situational, applied when temperatures genuinely threatened player safety. The 2026 version is structural: baked into every match regardless of conditions.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Read Entire Article