The internet's initial promise of decentralization has shifted towards centralization and conflict. China's controlled internet model is viewed with envy by some world leaders. Western narratives often oversimplify the complexities of the Chinese internet.
Key Takeaways
- The internet’s initial promise of decentralization has shifted towards centralization and conflict.
- China’s controlled internet model is viewed with envy by some world leaders.
- Western narratives often oversimplify the complexities of the Chinese internet.
- Personal stories provide a nuanced view of China’s digital landscape.
- Vague censorship laws in China enhance their effectiveness.
- Censorship in China now includes deviations from the party’s ideology.
- Both direct directives and proactive self-censorship drive China’s censorship.
- Criticism of local officials in China is heavily censored.
- The tactic of “flooding” is used to suppress unwanted news online.
- Patterns of online behavior are universal, not just limited to China.
- The Chinese internet is often viewed through a Western security lens.
- The evolution of censorship in China reflects broader ideological control.
- Online manipulation tactics are prevalent in both Chinese and Western media.
- The global perspective on internet governance is shaped by China’s model.
- The complexities of China’s internet require a deeper understanding beyond Western narratives.
Guest intro
Yi-Ling Liu is a journalist-in-residence at the Tarbell Center for AI Journalism. She launched and led the China desk at Rest of World as its first China Editor. She is the author of The Wall Dancers: Searching for Freedom and Connection on the Chinese Internet, published by Knopf.
The evolution of the internet and its impact
-
The initial utopian promise of the internet has not materialized, leading to a landscape filled with conflict and centralization.
— Yi-Ling Liu
- The internet has shifted from a decentralized platform to one dominated by central authorities.
-
I would say cesspool sasspool is a good one too… it is interesting how far we’ve deviated from that initial utopian premise of the internet.
— Yi-Ling Liu
- The current state of the internet contrasts sharply with its original ideals.
- The transformation of the internet reflects broader societal changes.
- Centralization has led to increased control and conflict online.
- The internet’s evolution highlights the tension between freedom and control.
-
Understanding the evolution of the internet from a decentralized platform to one dominated by central authorities and conflict.
— Yi-Ling Liu
Global perspectives on China’s internet model
-
Many world leaders are envious of China’s controlled internet model.
— Yi-Ling Liu
- China’s approach to internet governance is seen as a model by some international leaders.
- The controlled internet model in China is perceived as effective by some global leaders.
-
I really do believe to some extent that a lot of the leaders around the world are looking at china in a seemingly more controlled internet like with jealousy.
— Yi-Ling Liu
- The global perspective on internet governance is influenced by China’s model.
- China’s internet control highlights the balance between regulation and freedom.
- The international community views China’s internet model with a mix of admiration and concern.
- The effectiveness of China’s model is seen in its ability to maintain control over digital spaces.
The narrative around the Chinese internet
-
The narrative around the Chinese internet is overly simplistic and often framed through a Western lens.
— Yi-Ling Liu
- Western narratives often fail to capture the complexities of China’s digital landscape.
- The Chinese internet is frequently viewed through the lens of American national security.
-
I think the big issue here is that the Chinese internet is always framed through and seen through the lens of American national security and economic interests.
— Yi-Ling Liu
- The dominant narratives about China require a more nuanced understanding.
- The geopolitical context shapes the media narratives surrounding China.
- Simplistic narratives overlook the complexities and contradictions of the Chinese internet.
- A deeper understanding of China’s internet culture is necessary for accurate analysis.
The role of personal stories in understanding China’s internet
-
Interviewing individuals provides a more complex and humanized perspective on the Chinese internet.
— Yi-Ling Liu
- Personal narratives offer a deeper insight into the complexities of China’s digital landscape.
-
I wanted to force people out of these tropes and the way to see kind of China and the Chinese internet in all its complexity and contradictions is through people and through individual lives.
— Yi-Ling Liu
- Personal stories challenge conventional analyses of the Chinese internet.
- Understanding individual experiences provides a richer perspective on societal issues.
- The complexity of China’s internet is best understood through personal narratives.
- Personal stories reveal the contradictions and complexities of China’s digital culture.
- A humanized perspective offers a more accurate view of China’s internet landscape.
Mechanisms of censorship in China
-
The vagueness of censorship in China allows it to function effectively.
— Yi-Ling Liu
- Vague censorship laws enhance the effectiveness of control in China.
-
I think the reason being like the censorship ecosystem thrives off vagueness right the fact that it’s vague the fact that there are no red lines is what allows it to function so effectively.
— Yi-Ling Liu
- The strategic ambiguity of censorship laws enables their effectiveness.
- Censorship in China has evolved to include deviations from the party’s ideology.
-
Censorship in China has evolved to include anything that deviates from the party’s ideological agenda.
— Yi-Ling Liu
- The evolution of censorship reflects broader ideological control.
- The lack of clear red lines in censorship laws allows for broad interpretation.
- Censorship in China is a tool for maintaining ideological conformity.
The structure of internet regulation in China
-
The censorship process in China involves both direct directives from regulators and proactive self-censorship by platforms.
— Yi-Ling Liu
- Both top-down and bottom-up approaches drive censorship in China.
-
How it actually works behind the scenes is that some higher level top regulators say that the Chinese cyberspace administration the cac will write a directive… that will then get passed on to weibo sensors who then start scrubbing that off their news feed or it happens the other way where weibo’s sensors aren’t even receiving that directive but in a proactively like a student who is really nervous about upsetting their teacher in advance will just go and scrub that off even before receiving that directive.
— Yi-Ling Liu
- Proactive self-censorship by platforms is a key component of China’s censorship.
- The Chinese cyberspace administration plays a central role in internet regulation.
- Directives from regulators guide the censorship process in China.
- The structure of internet regulation in China involves multiple layers of control.
- The interplay between direct directives and self-censorship ensures effective control.
The risks of criticizing government actions in China
-
Criticism of local officials and government actions is treated with great caution and often removed from public discourse.
— Yi-Ling Liu
- Criticism of government actions in China is heavily censored.
-
Whenever there’s any criticism of any kind of local official local government that’s technically looked on with great caution and taken down.
— Yi-Ling Liu
- The political climate in China is sensitive to criticism of government actions.
- Censorship of government criticism reflects broader implications for freedom of speech.
- The risks associated with discussing government actions highlight the limits of free expression.
- Criticism of local officials is treated with caution and often removed.
- The sensitivity surrounding government criticism underscores the control over public discourse.
Online manipulation and content suppression tactics
-
The concept of flooding involves groups of individuals overwhelming a news feed with content to suppress unwanted news.
— Yi-Ling Liu
- The tactic of “flooding” is used to suppress unwanted news online.
-
There’s this dynamic called flooding which refers to when incels or a particular group of online individuals are pumping just content onto a news feed to try to get rid of news that they don’t want people to look at.
— Yi-Ling Liu
- Online manipulation tactics are prevalent in both Chinese and Western media.
- The role of online manipulation highlights the challenges of information warfare.
- Content suppression tactics are used to control the narrative in digital spaces.
- The tactic of flooding reflects broader strategies of media manipulation.
- Online manipulation is a significant challenge in maintaining the integrity of information.
Universal patterns of online behavior
-
Patterns of online behavior and influence are not unique to China but are endemic to the internet as a whole.
— Yi-Ling Liu
- Online behavior patterns are universal, not just limited to China.
-
Some of these patterns do not seem distinct to china it’s almost like they’re endemic to the internet itself regardless of what the official rules are.
— Yi-Ling Liu
- The universality of online behavior highlights common challenges in internet culture.
- Similar patterns of influence and behavior can be found globally.
- The dynamics of online influence manifest across different cultures and political systems.
- The universality of online behavior suggests common challenges in digital communication.
- Understanding these patterns is valuable for analyzing internet culture globally.

4 hours ago
2















English (US) ·