Trump and allies push to reshape Federal Reserve after Supreme Court ruling

The Supreme Court just told President Trump he can’t fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. His response, essentially: fine, we’ll find another way.

In a 5-4 decision handed down on June 29, the Court upheld the Federal Reserve Act’s “for cause” removal protections, ruling that Trump’s August 2025 attempt to oust Cook was unconstitutional. It was the first time in the Fed’s 111-year history that a president had tried to remove a sitting governor. The Court said no. Trump and his allies are now exploring other avenues to reshape the institution from the inside out.

What the Court actually decided

The case, Trump v. Cook, centered on a deceptively simple question: can the president fire a Fed governor just because he wants to? Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, said the answer is no.

The Federal Reserve Act has long stipulated that board governors can only be removed “for cause,” meaning there needs to be an actual reason beyond political disagreement. Roberts emphasized the importance of the Fed’s structural independence from the executive branch, arguing that the administration’s push for at-will removal authority had no legal foundation.

Cook, who made history as the first Black woman appointed to the Federal Reserve Board, will keep her seat. Her term doesn’t expire until 2038, which means she’ll likely outlast at least one more presidential administration.

On the very same day the Court protected Cook’s position, it handed Trump expanded authority to remove officials from other independent regulatory agencies. The Court essentially said the Federal Reserve occupies a unique position in the American governance structure, one that warrants stronger insulation from political pressure than other independent agencies.

The political chess match continues

Trump and his political allies have signaled their intent to pursue other mechanisms for influencing the Fed’s direction. While they can’t remove Cook, future vacancies on the seven-member Board of Governors offer the most obvious path. Presidential appointments to the Fed don’t require firing anyone, they just require patience and open seats.

Why crypto and risk asset investors should care

The Federal Reserve’s independence is the single most important variable in US monetary policy. Interest rate decisions, quantitative tightening or easing, inflation targeting: all of these flow from a Fed that can make unpopular choices without worrying about getting fired for making them.

The expanded presidential removal authority over other independent agencies adds another dimension. If Trump can now more easily replace leaders at agencies that touch financial regulation, the regulatory landscape for crypto could shift meaningfully. New appointees at agencies overseeing securities, commodities, or consumer finance could bring dramatically different approaches to digital asset oversight.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.