The DAO relaunches as a $130M Ethereum security fund a decade after its infamous hack

Ten years ago, a hacker exploited a reentrancy vulnerability in The DAO and walked away with roughly 3.6 million ETH. That single event fractured the Ethereum blockchain in two, spawned an entire smart contract security industry, and became the cautionary tale every crypto developer learns on day one.

Now the project is back, reborn as TheDAO Security Fund, with approximately 75,000 ETH, valued at around $220 million, being put to work protecting the very network it once nearly broke.

From wreckage to endowment

The original DAO launched in April 2016 as one of the most ambitious experiments in decentralized governance. Then, on June 17, 2016, an attacker exploited a reentrancy bug, a flaw that let the contract be called recursively before updating its balance, and drained roughly $50 million to $70 million worth of ETH.

What followed was one of the most contentious decisions in blockchain history. The Ethereum community voted to hard fork the chain and reverse the theft, effectively rolling back the ledger. Those who rejected the fork continued on the original chain, which became Ethereum Classic.

Not all of the recovered ETH was claimed. A significant portion sat untouched for a decade, quietly appreciating as Ethereum grew. That unclaimed stash is now the foundation of the new security fund.

The revival was announced on January 29, 2026, spearheaded by Griff Green, a co-founder of Giveth who was among the original white-hat rescuers of The DAO’s funds back in 2016. The fund counts seven curators, including Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin.

How the fund works

The majority of the 75,000 ETH is being staked, generating an estimated $8 million in annual yield. That yield becomes the fund’s operating budget, meaning the principal can remain largely intact while continuously funding security initiatives year after year.

An initial $13.5 million is being allocated through DAO governance mechanisms, including quadratic funding and retroactive public goods funding. Quadratic funding amplifies the impact of small donations by matching them proportionally, designed to ensure that broadly supported projects receive more resources than those backed by a handful of whales. Retroactive funding rewards work that has already proven valuable, rather than betting on promises.

The fund’s allocation priorities center on security researchers, tooling development, and rapid-response teams.

Original DAO token holders can still submit claims for their share of the unclaimed ETH, so the fund isn’t simply seizing forgotten assets.

Why this matters for Ethereum investors

The $8 million annual yield represents a self-sustaining model that doesn’t require continuous fundraising or token emissions. That’s a meaningful distinction from many grant programs in crypto that depend on treasury drawdowns or market-sensitive token sales.

The risk is governance. DAOs have a mixed track record when it comes to efficiently deploying capital. Quadratic funding and retroactive grants sound elegant in theory, but the history of on-chain governance is littered with voter apathy, whale dominance, and misallocated resources. Whether seven curators, even ones as credentialed as Buterin and Green, can steer $220 million worth of ETH toward genuinely impactful security work remains an open question.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.