T1, the most decorated organization in League of Legends history, has taken a commanding 2-0 lead over Brazil’s FURIA Esports in their best-of-5 knockout series at the 2026 Mid-Season Invitational. One more win and the Korean juggernaut advances. Betting markets had T1’s implied probability of winning at roughly 94-95%, so this is playing out exactly like the script everyone expected.
But here’s the thing. In a global esports tournament watched by millions, with massive sponsorship dollars and a passionate fanbase willing to spend on just about anything, there’s a conspicuous absence: crypto has essentially zero footprint in this matchup or the organizations involved.
The match itself
T1 entered the MSI 2026 knockout bracket as favorites. The organization has been the gold standard in competitive League of Legends for over a decade, consistently dominating the LCK, Korea’s premier league.
FURIA, representing Brazil, earned their spot here by winning the CBLOL (now part of the LTA South structure) in both the 2025-2 and 2026-1 splits. Brazilian League of Legends has a massive, vocal fanbase and increasingly competitive teams.
With T1 at match point in a best-of-5, FURIA would need to win three consecutive games against a team that rarely drops series from this position. That 94-95% implied probability from betting markets might actually be generous to the Brazilian squad.
Esports is booming, crypto is watching from the sidelines
Neither T1 nor FURIA has any meaningful crypto or digital asset integration in this tournament. No fan tokens. No NFT partnerships. No blockchain-based prediction markets officially tied to the event.
During the last crypto bull cycle, esports organizations were signing sponsorship deals with exchanges and launching fan tokens at a furious pace. Teams across multiple games partnered with FTX, Crypto.com, and various NFT platforms. Then the bear market hit, FTX collapsed, and most of those deals evaporated. Esports organizations, burned by association with failed or controversial crypto brands, have been cautious about re-engaging.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

1 hour ago
2
















English (US) ·