3 hours ago
3
Manchester United has officially informed Olympique de Marseille that it will not trigger the buyback clause embedded in Mason Greenwood’s 2024 transfer deal. Instead, the club is betting that its sell-on clause, worth 40-50% of future profits, will deliver better risk-adjusted returns than re-acquiring a player whose off-pitch controversies made his departure necessary in the first place.
The deal structure, decoded
Greenwood moved from Old Trafford to Marseille in the summer of 2024 for approximately £26.6 million (roughly €31.6 million). United structured the deal with two key financial instruments: a buyback clause that gave them the right (but not the obligation) to re-sign Greenwood, and a sell-on clause entitling them to 40-50% of any future transfer profit.
Internal discussions about potentially exercising the buyback reportedly took place as recently as January 2026. The club ultimately decided against it.
Why walking away makes financial sense
Triggering a buyback clause isn’t free. It would have required United to pay a predetermined price to reacquire Greenwood, absorb his wages, and navigate the reputational complexity that originally pushed the club to sell him.
Meanwhile, Greenwood has performed well in Ligue 1, and he’s now reportedly attracting interest from other clubs, with Fenerbahce among those mentioned as potential suitors for a summer 2026 move.
If Marseille sells Greenwood at a profit, United’s sell-on clause kicks in automatically. Estimates suggest the club could pocket anywhere from £5 million to £17 million without lifting a finger, signing a contract, or managing any of the associated risk.
The estimated £5 million to £17 million windfall from a potential Greenwood sale by Marseille represents pure profit on a deal that already generated £26.6 million in initial revenue.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
English (US) · 