France’s perfect World Cup run is fueling a crypto prediction market frenzy

France hasn’t just been winning at the 2026 FIFA World Cup. They’ve been dominating. Six matches played, six matches won, zero losses, and a quarterfinal date with Morocco on the horizon.

The perfect run, by the numbers

France opened their campaign with a 3-1 victory over Senegal on June 16, then dispatched Iraq 3-0 on June 22. Norway fell 4-1 on June 26, Sweden went down 3-0 on June 30, and Paraguay managed to keep things tight but still lost 1-0 on July 4.

That’s 14 goals scored and just two conceded across five group stage and knockout round matches. The sixth win brought them into the quarterfinals, where Morocco awaits.

Mbappé has been the engine behind it all, netting six goals through the tournament’s first rounds.

Prediction markets and crypto betting are surging

Crypto-native prediction platforms and betting protocols have reportedly seen increased activity surrounding France’s matches throughout the tournament.

The World Cup itself has become a proving ground for blockchain’s utility in sports. FIFA launched a dedicated Layer-1 blockchain for the 2026 tournament, designed to support digital collectibles and potentially NFT-based ticketing initiatives.

A Solana-based “World Cup Token” also exists, though its trading activity has been minimal during the tournament.

The fan token gap

One notable absence in all of this: France doesn’t have an official fan token. Compare that to Argentina, which has actively engaged supporters through platforms like Chiliz, the blockchain infrastructure behind dozens of professional sports fan tokens.

France’s lack of a token means there’s no direct crypto asset tied to their performance for fans to rally around. Whatever enthusiasm French supporters feel is flowing into general prediction markets and betting platforms rather than a dedicated token economy.

For comparison, countries with active fan tokens have historically seen price spikes correlated with tournament victories.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.