EU leaders clash over bloc’s next 7-year budget, seek new revenue from crypto and carbon taxes

The European Union is trying to figure out how to fund the next seven years of its existence, and crypto holders might end up footing part of the bill.

EU leaders are set to debate the bloc’s Multiannual Financial Framework for 2028-2034, following the European Commission’s proposal on July 16, 2025, for a budget of nearly €2 trillion. That figure represents about 1.26% of the bloc’s gross national income. The conversation is centering on a familiar tension: net contributors want to keep their wallets closed, beneficiaries want the money spigot to stay on, and everyone is looking for someone else to pick up the check.

The own resources gamble

Here’s the thing about EU budgets. They’re funded primarily by national contributions, which means every spending increase turns into a political knife fight between 27 member states. The workaround being explored this time is a set of independent revenue streams, known in Brussels-speak as “own resources.”

Five new own resources are projected to generate approximately €58.2 billion annually at 2025 prices.

The biggest single contributor could be a €2 per kilogram fee on non-collected e-waste, estimated to yield around €15 billion per year. Tobacco excise duties, with the EU skimming 15% off the top, could generate roughly €11.2 billion annually. A 30% share of revenues from the EU Emissions Trading System is pegged at about €9.6 billion per year.

Then there’s the Corporate Resource for Europe levy, a contribution from large firms that could bring in approximately €6.8 billion annually. And 75% of revenues from the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism might add another €1.4 billion per year.

Crypto in the crosshairs

Among the revenue ideas being floated are levies on digital services, online gambling, extreme wealth, and, notably, transactions related to crypto assets.

The numbers being modeled internally are not trivial. A 0.1% crypto transaction levy could raise an estimated €3-4 billion per year. A capital gains tax on crypto assets could yield an additional €1-2.4 billion annually. Under some scenarios, combined cryptocurrency measures could contribute up to approximately €20 billion over the entire 2028-2034 budget period.

The European Parliament has been pushing hard on this front, calling for at least €60 billion annually in new resources and specifically advocating for a digital levy and a uniform capital gains tax on crypto assets.

No specific tokens or asset classes have been identified in the discussions. The focus remains on the potential for future tax measures broadly linked to the crypto sector rather than targeting any particular protocol or platform.

It’s worth noting that these estimates come with a massive asterisk. Internal modeling acknowledges that revenue projections remain tentative due to crypto market instability.

The political chess match

The budget approval process is layered and slow. EU leaders are expected to provide preliminary signals on their revenue preferences to support a compromise proposal from Ireland before more detailed negotiations kick off in October.

The fundamental divide is structural. Countries that pay more into the EU budget than they receive want to limit higher outlays. Countries that benefit from EU cohesion funds and agricultural subsidies want spending maintained or increased. New revenue sources are the diplomatic escape valve, letting both sides claim partial victory without directly increasing national contributions.

What this means for crypto investors

The more immediate concern is what a uniform capital gains tax across 27 member states would mean for the current patchwork of crypto tax regimes in Europe. Some EU countries currently offer relatively favorable treatment for long-term crypto holdings. A harmonized approach could eliminate those advantages, potentially shifting where crypto businesses and traders choose to base their operations.

The bloc already implemented MiCA, its comprehensive crypto regulation framework, and layering tax obligations on top of licensing requirements raises the cost of doing business in the European market.

The timeline matters here. These are proposals in early-stage discussion, not legislation heading to a vote next week. October negotiations will reveal which revenue ideas have genuine political support and which are bargaining chips. Crypto investors should watch for the Irish compromise proposal, as it will likely indicate whether digital asset taxation has moved from theoretical revenue modeling to concrete policy drafting.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.